Не зная сути дела и вердикта, опираясь на чужую статью, сделать правильные выводы очень трудно. Благо, в Латвии нет прецедентного права и каждый случай должен рассматриваться по существу.
В случае с описанной в публикации ситуацией, очевидно, суд посчитал лайк достаточным основанием для выражения согласия. Неясно, апеллировал ли несогласный к возможному случайному касанию экрана, но стоило бы…
Впрочем, вот вы прочли, согласны с выводами редакции, но ведь даже специально не лайкнули, не шернули, не комментнули. О какой случайности в таком случае может идти речь?
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
